Exam Dumps Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Zip, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate VCE Exam Simulator

Blog Article

Tags: Exam Dumps Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Zip, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate VCE Exam Simulator, Study Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Tool, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Passleader Review, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Latest Test Format

If you still upset about your Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification exams and look for professional Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning guide materials on the internet purposelessly, it is a good way for candidates to choose our best Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam preparation materials which can help you consolidate of key knowledge effectively & quickly. Before purchasing we provide free PDF demo download for your reference. After purchasing our products, you can receive our products within 10 minutes and you have no need to spend too much time on your Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exams but obtain certification in short time.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal licensing requirements in this topic.
Topic 2	Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.
Topic 3	Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.
Topic 4	Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.

>> Exam Dumps Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Zip <<

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate VCE Exam Simulator & Study Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Tool

PrepAwayETE Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) PDF exam questions file is portable and accessible on laptops, tablets, and smartphones. This pdf contains test questions compiled by experts. Answers to these pdf questions are correct and cover each section of the examination. You can even use this format of Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate questions without restrictions of place and time. This Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Pdf Format is printable to read real questions manually. We update our pdf questions collection regularly to match the updates of the Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate real exam.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q59-Q64):

NEW QUESTION # 59
A Generative Al Engineer is creating an LLM-based application. The documents for its retriever have been chunked to a maximum of 512 tokens each. The Generative Al Engineer knows that cost and latency are more important than quality for this application. They have several context length levels to choose from.
Which will fulfill their need?

A. context length 512: smallest model is 0.13GB and embedding dimension 384
B. context length 514; smallest model is 0.44GB and embedding dimension 768
C. context length 32768: smallest model is 14GB and embedding dimension 4096
D. context length 2048: smallest model is 11GB and embedding dimension 2560

Answer: A

Explanation:
When prioritizing cost and latency over quality in a Large Language Model (LLM)-based application, it is crucial to select a configuration that minimizes both computational resources and latency while still providing reasonable performance. Here's whyDis the best choice:
* Context length: The context length of 512 tokens aligns with the chunk size used for the documents (maximum of 512 tokens per chunk). This is sufficient for capturing the needed information and generating responses without unnecessary overhead.
* Smallest model size: The model with a size of 0.13GB is significantly smaller than the other options.
This small footprint ensures faster inference times and lower memory usage, which directly reduces both latency and cost.
* Embedding dimension: While the embedding dimension of 384 is smaller than the other options, it is still adequate for tasks where cost and speed are more important than precision and depth of understanding.
This setup achieves the desired balance between cost-efficiency and reasonable performance in a latency- sensitive, cost-conscious application.

NEW QUESTION # 60
A Generative AI Engineer developed an LLM application using the provisioned throughput Foundation Model API. Now that the application is ready to be deployed, they realize their volume of requests are not sufficiently high enough to create their own provisioned throughput endpoint. They want to choose a strategy that ensures the best cost-effectiveness for their application.
What strategy should the Generative AI Engineer use?

A. Deploy the model using pay-per-token throughput as it comes with cost guarantees
B. Throttle the incoming batch of requests manually to avoid rate limiting issues
C. Switch to using External Models instead
D. Change to a model with a fewer number of parameters in order to reduce hardware constraint issues

Answer: A

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs a cost-effective deployment strategy for an LLM application with relatively low request volume.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Switching to external models may not provide the required control or integration necessary for specific application needs.
* Option B: Using a pay-per-token model is cost-effective, especially for applications with variable or low request volumes, as it aligns costs directly with usage.
* Option C: Changing to a model with fewer parameters could reduce costs, but might also impact the performance and capabilities of the application.
* Option D: Manually throttling requests is a less efficient and potentially error-prone strategy for managing costs.
OptionBis ideal, offering flexibility and cost control, aligning expenses directly with the application's usage patterns.

NEW QUESTION # 61
After changing the response generating LLM in a RAG pipeline from GPT-4 to a model with a shorter context length that the company self-hosts, the Generative AI Engineer is getting the following error:

What TWO solutions should the Generative AI Engineer implement without changing the response generating model? (Choose two.)

A. Use a smaller embedding model to generate
B. Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model
C. Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database
D. Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents
E. Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi

Answer: C,D

Explanation:
* Problem Context: After switching to a model with a shorter context length, the error message indicating that the prompt token count has exceeded the limit suggests that the input to the model is too large.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use a smaller embedding model to generate- This wouldn't necessarily address the issue of prompt size exceeding the model's token limit.
* Option B: Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model- This option affects the output length, not the size of the input being too large.
* Option C: Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents- This would help reduce the size of each document chunk fed into the model, ensuring that the input remains within the model's context length limitations.
* Option D: Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database- By retrieving fewer records, the total input size to the model can be managed more effectively, keeping it within the allowable token limits.
* Option E: Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi- Retraining the model is contrary to the stipulation not to change the response generating model.
OptionsCandDare the most effective solutions to manage the model's shorter context length without changing the model itself, by adjusting the input size both in terms of individual document size and total documents retrieved.

NEW QUESTION # 62
A Generative Al Engineer wants their (inetuned LLMs in their prod Databncks workspace available for testing in their dev workspace as well. All of their workspaces are Unity Catalog enabled and they are currently logging their models into the Model Registry in MLflow.
What is the most cost-effective and secure option for the Generative Al Engineer to accomplish their gAi?

A. Setup a script to export the model from prod and import it to dev.
B. Setup a duplicate training pipeline in dev, so that an identical model is available in dev.
C. Use MLflow to log the model directly into Unity Catalog, and enable READ access in the dev workspace to the model.
D. Use an external model registry which can be accessed from all workspaces

Answer: C

Explanation:
The goal is to make fine-tuned LLMs from a production (prod) Databricks workspace available for testing in a development (dev) workspace, leveraging Unity Catalog and MLflow, while ensuring cost-effectiveness and security. Let's analyze the options.
* Option A: Use an external model registry which can be accessed from all workspaces
* An external registry adds cost (e.g., hosting fees) and complexity (e.g., integration, security configurations) outside Databricks' native ecosystem, reducing security compared to Unity Catalog's governance.
* Databricks Reference:"Unity Catalog provides a centralized, secure model registry within Databricks"("Unity Catalog Documentation," 2023).
* Option B: Setup a script to export the model from prod and import it to dev
* Export/import scripts require manual effort, storage for model artifacts, and repeated execution, increasing operational cost and risk (e.g., version mismatches, unsecured transfers). It's less efficient than a native solution.
* Databricks Reference: Manual processes are discouraged when Unity Catalog offers built-in sharing:"Avoid redundant workflows with Unity Catalog's cross-workspace access"("MLflow with Unity Catalog").
* Option C: Setup a duplicate training pipeline in dev, so that an identical model is available in dev
* Duplicating the training pipeline doubles compute and storage costs, as it retrains the model from scratch. It's neither cost-effective nor necessary when the prod model can be reused securely.
* Databricks Reference:"Re-running training is resource-intensive; leverage existing models where possible"("Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Use MLflow to log the model directly into Unity Catalog, and enable READ access in the dev workspace to the model
* Unity Catalog, integrated with MLflow, allows models logged in prod to be centrally managed and accessed across workspaces with fine-grained permissions (e.g., READ for dev). This is cost- effective (no extra infrastructure or retraining) and secure (governed by Databricks' access controls).
* Databricks Reference:"Log models to Unity Catalog via MLflow, then grant access to other workspaces securely"("MLflow Model Registry with Unity Catalog," 2023).
Conclusion: Option D leverages Databricks' native tools (MLflow and Unity Catalog) for a seamless, cost- effective, and secure solution, avoiding external systems, manual scripts, or redundant training.

NEW QUESTION # 63
A Generative Al Engineer is using an LLM to classify species of edible mushrooms based on text descriptions of certain features. The model is returning accurate responses in testing and the Generative Al Engineer is confident they have the correct list of possible labels, but the output frequently contains additional reasoning in the answer when the Generative Al Engineer only wants to return the label with no additional text.
Which action should they take to elicit the desired behavior from this LLM?

A. Use zero shot chain-of-thought prompting to prevent a verbose output format
B. Use few snot prompting to instruct the model on expected output format
C. Use zero shot prompting to instruct the model on expected output format
D. Use a system prompt to instruct the model to be succinct in its answer

Answer: D

Explanation:
The LLM classifies mushroom species accurately but includes unwanted reasoning text, and the engineer wants only the label. Let's assess how to control output format effectively.
* Option A: Use few shot prompting to instruct the model on expected output format
* Few-shot prompting provides examples (e.g., input: description, output: label). It can work but requires crafting multiple examples, which is effort-intensive and less direct than a clear instruction.
* Databricks Reference:"Few-shot prompting guides LLMs via examples, effective for format control but requires careful design"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option B: Use zero shot prompting to instruct the model on expected output format
* Zero-shot prompting relies on a single instruction (e.g., "Return only the label") without examples. It's simpler than few-shot but may not consistently enforce succinctness if the LLM's default behavior is verbose.
* Databricks Reference:"Zero-shot prompting can specify output but may lack precision without examples"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Use zero shot chain-of-thought prompting to prevent a verbose output format
* Chain-of-Thought (CoT) encourages step-by-step reasoning, which increases verbosity-opposite to the desired outcome. This contradicts the goal of label-only output.
* Databricks Reference:"CoT prompting enhances reasoning but often results in detailed responses"("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Use a system prompt to instruct the model to be succinct in its answer
* A system prompt (e.g., "Respond with only the species label, no additional text") sets a global instruction for the LLM's behavior. It's direct, reusable, and effective for controlling output style across queries.
* Databricks Reference:"System prompts define LLM behavior consistently, ideal for enforcing concise outputs"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
Conclusion: Option D is the most effective and straightforward action, using a system prompt to enforce succinct, label-only responses, aligning with Databricks' best practices for output control.

NEW QUESTION # 64
......

The team appointed by the PrepAwayETE is dedicated and hardworking and strives hard to refine the Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps and make them meet the standards set by the Databricks. It does so by taking the valuable suggestions of more than 90,000 professionals in this field. The unique, trustworthy, and error-free material will turn your preparation for the Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification exam productive, organized, and helpful.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate VCE Exam Simulator: https://www.prepawayete.com/Databricks/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-practice-exam-dumps.html

Report this page

EXAM DUMPS DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE ZIP, DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE VCE EXAM SIMULATOR

Exam Dumps Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Zip, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate VCE Exam Simulator